How is it possible that the same guy who won the Nobel Peace Prize is ordering overseas drone strikes on countries we’re not at war with in order to assassinate US citizens without benefit of hearing or trial? How is anyone able to justify a vote for this bastard? I’m serious. If anyone can justify this, please do explain it to me.

 
  1. riskylengths said: I’m going with “Because there’s no way in hell I’m going to vote for the other bastards.” He never should’ve been awarded the Prize. It only represented how the committee felt about W, who kidnapped foreign citizens. Which we might still be doing.
  2. nsomn said: Because otherwise it’s a vote for the other bastard? I’m not good at politics, this might be an unpopular opinion.
  3. barretta posted this